A new batch of stone tools suggest humans colonised the famous Indonesian 'hobbit' island of Flores much earlier than previously thought, say researchers.
Professor Mike Morwood and Dr Adam Brumm of the University of Wollongong and colleagues report their study of the tools today in the journal Nature.
"We're pushing back the antiquity of hominins on Flores," says Morwood.
Prior to this study, the oldest stone tools found on Flores were about 880,000 years old.
Now in joint research with the Indonesian-Australian research with the Geological Survey Institute of Bandung, Morwood, Brum and colleagues have dated tools around a million years old, pushing the date that humans colonised Flores back by 120,000 years.
The tools came from an entirely new site in the Soa basin, to the east of Liang Bua cave, where the 18,000-year-old 'hobbit', Homo floresiensis was found.
The tools, which could only have been made by early humans, were in the very bottom sediment layers of the site, just above the bedrock.
Morwood, Brumm and colleagues used a dating method that measures the amount of argon gas trapped in minerals present in volcanic ash deposits above the stone tools.
Brumm says while the findings are "exciting", they are also "frustrating".
The fact these tools are on the bedrock at these sites, mean that any evidence of even earlier human occupation of Flores would not be found there.
"The search is on to try and find other sedimentary basins on Flores that may well have a geological record spanning 1 to 2 million years ago," says Brumm.
He says the ideal situation would be to find skeletal remains of early humans in sediments dating back to the early and middle Pleistocene.
When the hobbit was first discovered, it was thought to be descended from the large-bodied Homo erectus, which had somehow become isolated on Flores and undergone dwarfism.
But, says Morwood, subsequent anatomical evidence suggested the hobbit was instead descended from an even more primitive and smaller creature, such as Homo habilis.
The presence of such a primitive creature in this part of the globe challenges the generally accepted "Out of Africa" theory and suggests important human evolution may have happened in Asia.
No physical evidence for a Homo habilis-like creature has ever been found in the area.
But the researchers hope the stone tool evidence may provide circumstantial evidence to support this theory by providing evidence of human colonisation before Homo erectus was around.
"We're starting a major project this year - a five-year project - and we hope to push back the dates much much further," says Morwood.
"We need dates of 1.5 or 1.8 [million years ago] or more to say this is definitely not Erectus we're talking about."
Brumm also says the discovery of evidence for early humans one million years ago, also suggests that they may have not hunted pygmy stegadon and giant tortoises to death as previously thought.
Until now, the evidence showed the disappearance of pygmy stegadon and giant tortoise when stone tools appeared 880,000 years ago
"So it appeared that at around 880,000 years ago, hominids suddenly arrived on Flores and very rapidly wiped out these pygmy stegadon and giant tortoise, both of which would have been quite easy to hunt."
But, he says the most recent discovery of tools suggests that humans coexisted with these animals and they died out due to other causes.