Menu
Land and oceans
White roofs could cool cities: study
Enzyme crystal helps crack HIV puzzle
Sugar sweetens decision making
Twilight zone secrets revealed
Astronomers spot asteroid collision
Algae master quantum mechanics
Protein 'ushers' key to beating malaria
Researchers spin artificial bee silk
New view of Pluto increases mystery
Cell's power packs came from within
Antarctic snow linked to WA dry
Termites inspire hydrophobic materials
Study shows why it's scary to lose money
Soil impact underestimated: climate study
Lack of oxygen forced fish's first breath
Harder Sudoku puzzles on the way?
Weed genes could help feed the world
Logging makes forests more flammable: study
Food crisis looms warn scientists
Tiny sensors track 'lost' objects
'Climategate' university orders review
'Plumbing' key to flowering success
New twist on solar cell design
Scientists set new temperature record
Some nano-sunscreens 'come at a cost'
The most effective nanoparticles in some invisible sunscreens might also be the most toxic, suggests a new Australian modelling study.

The study, by Dr Amanda Barnard of CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering in Melbourne, appears in today's issue of Nature Nanotechnology.

Barnard carried out computer simulations of the properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, which are used to make some sunscreens transparent, increasing their appeal to consumers.

"There's a whole range of demographics that would never ever use sunscreens if they were ugly," says Barnard.

"The transparent ones do increase usage and protection from skin cancer in certain demographics, so they do have an important function."

But, she says, questions have been raised about the safety of such sunscreens.

One particular concern is whether the nanoparticles interact with sunlight to produce free radicals that damage tissues or DNA.

Barnard's computer model examined titanium dioxide nanoparticles from 3 to 200 nanometres in size.

"This is the size range that would generally be used in different types of sunscreens," she says.

The model predicted the affect of nanoparticle size and concentration on sun-protection ability, transparency and potential to produce free radicals.
Trade-off

Barnard found that the size and concentrations of nanoparticles that gave the best transparency and sun protection also gave the highest potential for production of free radicals.

"Where we have the highest sun-protection factor - and it's pretty - it [the sunscreen] is also toxic, potentially," she says.

"Ultimately we have to trade off. We can't have our cake and eat it too."

Barnard found that only particles less than 13 nanometres in size would minimise free radical production while maximising transparency and sun protection.

But, she cautions against concluding that all particles under 13 nanometres in size would be free of potential risk.

"We only looked at free radical production and tiny particles like that could still be toxic for other reasons that still need to be tested," says Barnard.

She says further studies on the environmental impacts of nanoparticles in sunscreens are also required.

"All of these things wash off, when we're swimming, and we wash them off and flush them down the sink," Barnard says.
Red flag?

According to Georgia Miller from the Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project, most sunscreens containing titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the market would be using particles bigger than 13 nanometres.

If this is the case, says Miller, the research by Barnard suggests that the risk of free radical production in most is likely to cancel out the benefit of sun protection, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) should not permit their use.

A spokeswoman for the TGA says the authority is examining the paper by Barnard, but was unable to provide further comment at the time of writing.

The TGA website states that to date, the current weight of evidence suggests that titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens do not present a risk because they remain in the outer layer of the skin.

But environment and consumer groups are concerned about the lack of in-vivo studies of sunscreens and have been calling on the TGA to require nano-ingredients in sunscreen be tested, labelled and properly regulated.

Not all transparent or invisible sunscreens contain nanoparticles.

Print
Horny mother beetles fight for dung
Light-speed computing one step closer
Small asteroids 'just lumps of gravel'
Gene study reveals diverse gut zoo
Dinosaur extinction caused by asteroid: study
Study finds methane bubbling from Arctic
New view reveals Mars' icy history
Some nano-sunscreens 'come at a cost'
Dust bunnies could harbour toxic load
Aphid genome reveals its 'Achilles heel'
Tailored diet may slow down DNA damage
Scientist probe ballistic chameleon tongue
Moa eggshells yield ancient DNA
Toothbrush tech helps buses go green
Gene protects some Tassie devils from tumour
Smaller fish cope better with acidic water
Lunar mirror mystery solved
Parents give fewer bad genes than thought
Women on pill may live longer
Antarctic winds affect key ocean layer
Researchers uncover thalidomide mystery
Boost for evidence of early ocean
Ocean geoengineering may prove lethal
People leave unique 'germ print'
Rogue star on collision course
Butterflies 'fly early as planet warms'
Glaucoma may start in the brain
Tools push back dates for humans on Flores
Menu
Stem cell capsules to target broken bones
Ecstasy damages complex memory: study
Earliest animals flexed their muscles
Insomnia may shrink the brain: study
Experts call for 'resilience thinking'
Tutu's DNA could point to medical cures
Humble algae key to whale evolution
Happiness linked to healthy heart
Fewer cyclones, but more intense: study
Cosmic candles result of colliding stars
Flightless mosquitoes may curb dengue
Childhood poverty may leave its mark
Cautious response to technology strategy
Nanowire RAM to make ever-ready computers
Are non-smokers smarter than smokers?
There's iron in them thar Martian hills
'Shell Crusher' shark swam ancient oceans
Nanotechnology may tap into your mind
Small dogs originated in the Middle East
Brain 'hears' sound of silence
Swimmers 'may not understand' tsunami risk
Altruism surfaces on slow-sinking ship
Chile quake tops Haiti, but less deadly
Weedkiller 'makes boy frogs lay eggs'
Visit Statistics
http://google.com/

http://bing.com/

https://gepatit-info.top/

https://serdechnic.com/

https://buy-meds24.com/

https://dverirespekt.ru/

https://www.sribno.net/

https://undergroundcityphoto.com/

https://detskiezabolevaniya.com/

http://grafaman.ru/

http://innoslicon.com/html/product/index.htm

https://yginekologa.com/

https://yes-com.com/

https://www.baikaleminer.com/

https://bitmaein.com/shop

https://www.artdeko.info/

https://aerodizain.com/

http://xn--d1abj0abs9d.in.ua/

http://lider82.ru/

http://sta-grand.ru/

http://snabs.kz/

https://sky-mine.ru/

https://rybalka-opt.ru/

http://snegozaderzhatel.ru/

https://xn--e1aaajzchnkg.ru.com/

http://hit-kino.ru/

http://www.regionshop.biz/

https://xn--80aaafbn2bc2ahdfrfkln6l.xn--p1ai/

https://pp-budpostach.com.ua/

https://vykup-avto-krasnodar.ru/

https://gcup.ru/

https://mega-polis.biz.ua/

http://vanrise.com.ua/

http://infra-e.ru/

https://veterinariya.com/

https://ponosanet.com/

https://cariestop.com/

https://proartrit.com/

https://elonm.ru/

https://nakozhe.com/

https://spinanebolit.com/

http://zameskino.ru/

http://kinoprinc.ru/

http://pospektr.ru/

http://buypillsonline24h.com/

http://komputers-best.ru/

https://komp-pomosch.ru/